Annual report I 6/15/12

(From a person or Marc who is NOT running for the BOD but is trying to save Valerie and correct a lot of very bad stuff.) (Minor editing.)
We received our 2011/2012 financial reports. They were supposed to be for 2011. Headings say 2011. Footnotes reveal VE (Vision Enterprises) included data through May 29, 2012. And .. Is the information truthful or accurate? Obviously the data/information is corrupted, faulty and suspect. These are auditors chosen by Jill Schachter. ???

Bottom line: We need Jill to explain. Sadly, the answer will probably be the usual “NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS”.

Shareholders: Please read the financial report very carefully. It appears the auditors are burying info. in the footnotes to escape notice and hide discrepancies/errors.

Two footnotes are noteworthy (red flags).

1. Footnote 8 states that "Management discovered" that it had failed to collect $15,000 in parking fees and $10,000 in gym fees. These funds have been included in the 2011 income. They were never collected. LIE! (Management says they hope to collect.) ????

a. "Management discovered" the missing money. BAD JOKE. I (Marc Ullman) discovered that Management was not paying us the money we were entitled to for the parking lot. This was brought this to the Board's attention in March of 2011. This started the questions about what Vision and Peter Mesos were doing with our money. Jill Schachter has been fighting to cover this up for almost a year -- and spending incredible amounts of our money to support the cover-up.

b. Gym Memberships are $150 a year. Did Management ever bother to bill anyone for the gym or is the $10,000 number made up just to hide how bad the problem is with the parking lot?

c. IF VISION WILL ADMIT TO SCREWING US OUT OF $25,000, HOW MUCH MONEY ARE WE REALLY MISSING? Cockroach Theory - You see one there are many many more.

2. The last item on footnote 1 says that "Management" included some items on the financial reports through May 29, 2012. We don't know exactly what items these were or how "Management" decided what to include, but a couple of things are obvious:

a. The "professional fees" of $97,000 certainly seem to be inflated by including bills from Super Lawyer Adam Bailey for 2012. This does several things including (i) making it look like we spent an insane amount of money on lawyers in 2011; (ii) justifying the never-ending assessment No. 2 that is used to feed the Super Lawyer’s insatiable appetite for legal fees ; and (iii) reducing whatever the real 2012 number is when we get our next financial statement because those expenses have already been charged to 2011.

b. Our income is inflated because it includes $25,000 that "management discovered" it didn't bother collecting on the parking lot and the gym.

Other information that the BOD does not want you to have: we paid our old lawyers, Schechter & Brucker $20,000 in 2011 before they were fired for asking questions about what Peter Mesos was doing with our money. We paid our former auditors Marin & Montanye $12,000 before they were fired when they wouldn’t let the Super Lawyer tell them how to audit our books – so we paid them $12,000 to do nothing because it was the only way to get them to stop asking questions. That leaves $65,000 for Jill to explain.

The election for the Board is only a few days away. We did not get the 2011 Financial Statement until June 13 for a reason – you are not supposed to have time to read and understand it. The only way we can protect ourselves as shareholders is to take the time and review this document to the best of our abilities, ask questions and demand answers on June 19. We’ve had enough